 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
solstar
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 131
Location: USA
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 01:37 |
 |
|
Because he is a greedy, power-hungry m***f***. I am ashamed to have a president like this for my country. 
(Not the most intelligent post, childish maybe, but I'm tired & that's the first thing that came to mind when I think about him.)
_________________
 Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind,
flight to the imagination, and life to everything.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FunkEducation
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 3309
Location: Maracay, Venezuela
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:38 |
|
|
| solstar wrote: |
| I am ashamed to have a president like this for my country. |
you're not the only one!
_________________
This is FunkEducation, supporting the 1992-1998 Jamiroquai!!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ivy
Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 336
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 14:58 |
|
|
ha! the two don't compare !!!  bush is beyond the deep end..he's the opposite disguised under the guise of "freedom, blah blah democracy"
chavez is simply representative of a population in my opinion that is fed up with being ignored, the poor!.... i know democracy doesn't work in lots of latin american countries including mine el sal, the gov since euro/spanish of pure descendancy (now more class) arrival have since tried to cleanse the country of indios/mestizos/poor  (including my beautiful self  , with help of the u.s. and so far they have been successful, a good portion of us live outside of the country, but the party fmln are organizing socialist movement for the residents still living there. Im happy were not being complacent about it
read here - http://www.workers.org/2007/world/salvador-0208/
a little background on what chavez is calling out on ,good for him!!! I'm glad of his efforts to try to fight Goliath which may seem insurmountable
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V109/N53/klinge.53o.html
.."In fact, US policy is anti-socialist independent of any perceived Soviet threat. Why not, when business interests control the media and the bulk of political funding? A leftist government in the Third World, if it can stand up to United States economic pressure, might divert profits to the peasants or urban poor of its country. It might set a "bad" example for other countries with valuable minerals or abundant cheap labor by valuing its citizens more than the property rights of its wealthy class. Its leaders might be viscerally anti-United States, having suffered at the hands of US-trained security forces. At the very least, this hypothetical leftist government would represent a slap in the face to free-enterprise ideology and a loss of control for the dominant world power. Rulers used to speak of Central America as "our backyard." Not our "neighbors," but somehow ours to control." < sounds like a certain hypothetical government hmm.....that was written in 1989 !
yes ...chavez did i guess over do it with the referendum but i think his heart was in it, it was not about him running a dictatorship at all, the way he accepted the results i think spoke volumes 
sorry if I wrote to much im usuually interested in this kind of stuff  , fun.
and juan carlos hahahah thinks he still in colonial times |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mr.az
Joined: 01 Sep 2005
Posts: 2421
Location: rallying
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 01:26 |
|
|
| Ivy wrote: |
ha! the two don't compare !!! bush is beyond the deep end..he's the opposite disguised under the guise of "freedom, blah blah democracy"
chavez is simply representative of a population in my opinion that is fed up with being ignored, the poor!
a little background on what chavez is calling out on ,good for him!!! I'm glad of his efforts to try to fight Goliath which may seem insurmountable
http://www-tech.mit.edu/V109/N53/klinge.53o.html
.."In fact, US policy is anti-socialist independent of any perceived Soviet threat. Why not, when business interests control the media and the bulk of political funding? A leftist government in the Third World, if it can stand up to United States economic pressure, might divert profits to the peasants or urban poor of its country. It might set a "bad" example for other countries with valuable minerals or abundant cheap labor by valuing its citizens more than the property rights of its wealthy class. Its leaders might be viscerally anti-United States, having suffered at the hands of US-trained security forces. At the very least, this hypothetical leftist government would represent a slap in the face to free-enterprise ideology and a loss of control for the dominant world power. Rulers used to speak of Central America as "our backyard." Not our "neighbors," but somehow ours to control." < sounds like a certain hypothetical government hmm.....that was written in 1989 !
and juan carlos thinks he still in colonial times |
agree ivy
thanks for bring this thread some of inteligence
bush is just the biggest motherfucker ever
juan carlos is friend of george bush 
and chavez isnt a dictator 
_________________
Only a fool can walk away from me this time
TWM=RDLS
AFO=AUTOMATON |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cosmic Noe
Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 22:21 |
|
|
Great! we're back to the topic! A lefty government wouldn't work here, that's right. But I think that a government pointing to the North country, and doing everything according to their "recipes" isn't right either.
A common work of all the latin american countries to stick a finger up their arses it's a very intelligent way to show them we can exist peacefully without their orders.
Fight tha power!!!
_________________
Call me up, turn me on, tune me in... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
Editorial
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Private messages
Log in
