jamirotalk.net header image
 

Impressum / EditorialEditorial  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  MemberlistMemberlist  RegisterRegister  ProfileProfile  Private messagesPrivate messages  Log inLog in

Reviews & Interviews on Jamiroquai's 'Dynamite' Online
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    JAMIROTALK.NET Forum Index -> Jamiroquai News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Jacquesy



Joined: 14 May 2005
Posts: 264
Location: England


PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 16:50    Reply with quote


I Love it just from 30 second! even if it is bad to others ive grown up with jamiroquai -i remember hearing eope on the radio when i was 3-in 1993- i only recently bought everything i could find that was jamiroquai and realised id been missing all these memories that follow tracks-to me bass is not a song nor vocoder etc I Listen More Lyrically thats why i pick up on the faults on the lyric page so fast-lyrics and beat make my songs. my mp3 player is jammed up to the max 62 songs 97% jamiroquai
so to the music i say keep it like that cause its positive- Laughing
_________________
-
--
Visit "Bang" NOW!!!
BANG and the dirt is gone!!


Last edited by Jacquesy on Thu Jun 09, 2005 06:40; edited 1 time in total
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

robotscantadlib



Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 242
Location: san francisco


PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 19:09    Reply with quote


kellte2 wrote:
We all respect your opinion not to like the album...now respect our opinion to enjoy it. I'm sorry that it isn't what you guys want, but why is it that the few that dislike the sound of Dynamite are the most vocal about their displeasure? 3-4 voices seem to always be complaining/starting fights. If you don't like it, we probably already know where you stand, so there's no reason to fight with other members...pleasure is subjective.


No need to fight, but I think our disgust with the album shows that there are people who will not just eat any crap Jay shits out. A 'negative' opinion should have the forum to exist, and I think this place is as good as any. But I respect people's differences in tastes. Maybe they are better Jamiroquai fans than I am since they are following this new sound direction a lot better. People like HappyDude and I just refuse to go with them, I suppose.
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address

DrPhunk



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Location: Brisbane, Australia


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 01:21    Reply with quote


this is totally nuts...the people complaining and lamenting the new sound are completely insane...

if you evaluate Dynamite as and old skewl acid jazz album, then yes, it is a crap one - BUT IT ISN"T ONE!

people that say 'wtf this isn't jamiroquai omg it's so shit' - last time i checked, the artist information for Dynamite said.....JAMIROQUAI.

the 'jamiroqai sound' is whatever the hell jay and the band damn well choses to produce at any given moment.

it's their band.

it's their album.

it's their careers.

they can make whatever music they want, and no-one has a right to critisize them for their choices

if you happen to like the music, fine.
if you don't that's fine as well.

you, as a consumer/fan/whatever have every right to take it or leave it, but don't convince yourself that as a 'fan', your personal tastes are important enough for Jamiroquai to adhere to.

seriously.
_________________
Have to get UP to get DOWN
THE REMEDY IS IN THA SOUND!
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

revolver_ocelot00



Joined: 08 Apr 2005
Posts: 44
Location: Toronto, Canada


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 02:28    Reply with quote


well said
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger

FunkEducation



Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 3309
Location: Maracay, Venezuela


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 03:36    Reply with quote


Christophe:) wrote:
Those albums are musically perfect, they are really complex and sounds perfect ! I read someone saying that Dynamite is mixed, produced and sounds better thatn TWM ? Ok for auto-convincing but don't be ridiculous...


yes they are man, and i agree with you in that...
but let me say you all something: as all of you know, i was the first person who said that this new album was going to be a completely shit... i accept it, i told it, and now i know how wrong i was...

of course i was (and i am, actually) waiting for a new TWM, or a new TROTSC, but remember, Jamiroquai is another band, compared with the band in those years. When i heard "black devil car" the first time, i said: "THE ALBUM IS GONNA BE A CRAP" and a lot of people here read that... and they know it. Then i listened "feels just..." and i was more dissapointed.... and then with Electric Mistress i said: What's the matter???

the incredible thing happened when i listened the full album the first time... ohh man Time Won't wait, Starchild, Tallulah, Don't give hate a chance, Dynamite, Seven days in Sunny June.... i said this album is amazing! those tracks are nothing compared with the songs of the first three albums, but they are so much better than i expected... they're so funky (and i know what is funky), i have heard some people saying that Electric Mistress is extremely funky, and i think: "What a hell are they thinking about? that's why they need a real FunkEducation!! hehehehe

the first things we heard about the new album were tracks like Funky Odyssey, Cannabliss and Black Devil Car (who were the most rocky songs i have never heard of Jamiroquai), but now with Dynamite i think the things have changed... they gave so much more of what i really expected...

Jamiroquai is not gonna be the same as the early band, but this album was ten million times better than A Funk Odyssey, they're not going to do the same things they did on the first albums, but they progressed a lot with this...
_________________
This is FunkEducation, supporting the 1992-1998 Jamiroquai!!

Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger

moonman



Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Posts: 10


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 04:02    Reply with quote

Long time reader, first time poster
What can I say, they went over the disco-deep end. I have'nt heard it all yet though.

and its really the most polished album they've done. Wonderful production. This is some of the best pure disco of the new millenium.

But it's undeniably Jamiroquai. Jay's singing style is still there. I can just say, 'yea thats Jam' even though its really disco-y , some of it.

Oh, and I'm surprised so many people in 2005 really want to hear 'acid jazz' or 'funk coming from Jamiroquai' . Jam is funky for sure, but was never FUNK, in the way P/F or anyone was, know that.

Honestly, If theres one thing I feared about Jamiroquai long ago, is that they would get stale. Their stuff would always be great, but the same over and over again. I'm glad personally that within their still very small range of styles, they are moving about (and it doesn't suck -- has anyone heard the newer Brand New Heavies? ::YAWN:Smile. And personally, I knew we'd get to this point when I first heard Supersonic.

not very organized, i know.
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

moonman



Joined: 03 Jun 2002
Posts: 10


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 04:13    Reply with quote


Quote:
Jam is funky for sure, but was never FUNK, in the way P/F or anyone was, know that.


and when I say that I also must put in that "Funk" is bull when its used as some nebulous way of describing a ' down to earth' group. Being just ' funky' is fine.

And who's saying this is commercial pop? This style and sound is sooo oldschool for the most part. It will first imbue a feel of some sort of inverted nostalgia. the kids will be listening to it and thinking back on '76 with fondness





while typing i just listened to " The World that He Wants"

It's crushing. This gives thier early stuff a feeling of flower-children naivete.

If anything its sobering after being so dancy. This song could make up a whole "Sea Change" type album.... I can see him and Elton John doing this song...... I can imagine them singing. It's just how he sang back in the day
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

FunkEducation



Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 3309
Location: Maracay, Venezuela


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 04:56    Reply with quote


so what's the difference between funky and funk???
is the same as saying that i am not black but i am white...

please explain me the difference, i'm not english or american... i really don't know, now that you use those words in different ways... bye
_________________
This is FunkEducation, supporting the 1992-1998 Jamiroquai!!

Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger

Happy Dude



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 28


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 05:02    Reply with quote


robotscantadlib wrote:
No need to fight, but I think our disgust with the album shows that there are people who will not just eat any crap Jay shits out. A 'negative' opinion should have the forum to exist, and I think this place is as good as any. But I respect people's differences in tastes. Maybe they are better Jamiroquai fans than I am since they are following this new sound direction a lot better. People like HappyDude and I just refuse to go with them, I suppose.


Man — you have said it!

To all those that LOVE Dynamite... CHILL OUT and let others express their opinion. We're all fans, otherwise we wouldn't be on this forum.

We're simply saying, that, new directions or not, the QUALITY isn't there like it used to be. The CREATIVITY is lacking.

TWM was different to ROTSC, which was different to EOPE. There were changes there and evolution. But the creativity was always there.

Then came Stynkronized, with the most average of songs. Repetitve, uncreative songs (Supersonic??!!).

AFO was not much better.

And now this. I mean, listen to the first track — it's one groove the WHOLE WAY through... and it's the most musically basic of grooves as well. It's a far cry from the soulful and interesting chord progressions of the past (Too Young To Die, Stillness in Time, Virutal Insanity)...

That's my 2 cents worth...

HD.

PS — can you honestly tell me that Hot Tequila Brown is LISTENABLE?
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

DrPhunk



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Location: Brisbane, Australia


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 05:08    Reply with quote

Re: Long time reader, first time poster
moonman wrote:
What can I say, they went over the disco-deep end. I have'nt heard it all yet though.

and its really the most polished album they've done. Wonderful production. This is some of the best pure disco of the new millenium.

But it's undeniably Jamiroquai. Jay's singing style is still there. I can just say, 'yea thats Jam' even though its really disco-y , some of it.

Oh, and I'm surprised so many people in 2005 really want to hear 'acid jazz' or 'funk coming from Jamiroquai' . Jam is funky for sure, but was never FUNK, in the way P/F or anyone was, know that.

Honestly, If theres one thing I feared about Jamiroquai long ago, is that they would get stale. Their stuff would always be great, but the same over and over again. I'm glad personally that within their still very small range of styles, they are moving about (and it doesn't suck -- has anyone heard the newer Brand New Heavies? ::YAWN:Smile. And personally, I knew we'd get to this point when I first heard Supersonic.

not very organized, i know.


Great to hear someone with a mature opinion once in a while Smile

Excellent point about becoming boring - bands that don't change, don't survive!
_________________
Have to get UP to get DOWN
THE REMEDY IS IN THA SOUND!
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

Happy Dude



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 28


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 05:14    Reply with quote


@ DrPhunk: we're not afraid of change... I don't want to hear EOPE 6 times over... But I at least want the new stuff to have the same quality as the old. And songs like Hot Tequila Brown, Black Devil Car, FJLIS... they just are lacking man.

DrPhunk wrote:
Great to hear someone with a mature opinion once in a while


Well that's a snide little remark!

not-so-happy dude
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

DrPhunk



Joined: 24 Jun 2004
Posts: 56
Location: Brisbane, Australia


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 05:26    Reply with quote


Happy Dude wrote:
We're simply saying, that, new directions or not, the QUALITY isn't there like it used to be. The CREATIVITY is lacking.


What puts you in a position to definitively say exactly how much creativity there is in this album, and then compare that value to other songs and albums in the Jam. catalogue? Are you a qualified music historian by any chance?

Let's not forget - music is art, not maths.

MANY tracks, when you hear them for the first few times, seem simple, but only with multiple listenings can you hear their true depth, and appreciate the musical talent and ingenuity that was needed to create that in a successful manner - Jamiroquai music, to me at least, is characterised by excellent depth and intricate interweaving of the various musical components.

In terms of technical quality, my opinion is that Dynamite (And AFO, just as much), represent Jamiroquai's most well-mixed, produced and polished work.
_________________
Have to get UP to get DOWN
THE REMEDY IS IN THA SOUND!
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message

mrdance



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 202
Location: South London


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 09:44    Reply with quote


Quote:


We're simply saying, that, new directions or not, the QUALITY isn't there like it used to be. The CREATIVITY is lacking.

But the creativity was always there.


It's a far cry from the soulful and interesting chord progressions



Ok, so I can't argue with you that if the quality of songwriting is down. That is your opinion.

But, lack of creativity?? I hope you've just chosen the wrong word there because if you did mean to type that, I'm sorry but you are quite clearly very bitter. This album by far is the most creative work I've ever seen JMQ do, in fact there is simply no point in saying why this is, because it is so obvious!

Interesting chord progressions also lacking? You are joking again right? Again, I need not point out examples but oh dear that is a VERY sweeping statement.[/quote]
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger

mrdance



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 202
Location: South London


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 09:47    Reply with quote


DrPhunk wrote:
Happy Dude wrote:
We're simply saying, that, new directions or not, the QUALITY isn't there like it used to be. The CREATIVITY is lacking.


What puts you in a position to definitively say exactly how much creativity there is in this album, and then compare that value to other songs and albums in the Jam. catalogue? Are you a qualified music historian by any chance?

Let's not forget - music is art, not maths.

MANY tracks, when you hear them for the first few times, seem simple, but only with multiple listenings can you hear their true depth, and appreciate the musical talent and ingenuity that was needed to create that in a successful manner - Jamiroquai music, to me at least, is characterised by excellent depth and intricate interweaving of the various musical components.

In terms of technical quality, my opinion is that Dynamite (And AFO, just as much), represent Jamiroquai's most well-mixed, produced and polished work.


Oops, i was so outraged by the Happy Dude's horribly ignorant statement I missed this! Exactly what I said, just put more succinctly;)
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger

HoT-TeQuila-Brown



Joined: 04 Jun 2005
Posts: 11


PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2005 10:23    Reply with quote


Yeh happydude aka Poofdudes statements are a bit ignorant.
_________________
Drinkin wine and killing time..sitting in the Summer sun.
Back to top 
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    JAMIROTALK.NET Forum Index -> Jamiroquai News All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11 ... 16, 17, 18  Next
Page 10 of 18

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group